Proverbs 8, Philo, and Early Christian Thinkers

The following piece is adapted from a longer entry that argues that the New Testament identifies Jesus as the creator.

Proverbs 8 is a highly influential text within Second Temple-era Judaism and its first-century mutations. Jews and Christians alike engaged with it, each trying to understand the passage’s contribution to the identity of the creator. Many great Christian thinkers have read this passage as descriptive of the Trinitarian Father-Son relationship. Justin Martyr and Origen were among the first to use Proverbs 8 in this way, a move that would later influence Nicene theology. They read the passage as saying that the Father created with the aid of, or through, Wisdom, later identified with the Son. Below is the relevant portion:

Proverbs 8:22-31 NRSVUE
[22] “The LORD created me at the beginning of his work, the first of his acts of long ago. [23] Ages ago I was set up, at the first, before the beginning of the earth. [24] When there were no depths I was brought forth, when there were no springs abounding with water. [25] Before the mountains had been shaped, before the hills, I was brought forth, [26] when he had not yet made earth and fields or the world’s first bits of soil. [27] When he established the heavens, I was there; when he drew a circle on the face of the deep, [28] when he made firm the skies above, when he established the fountains of the deep, [29] when he assigned to the sea its limit, so that the waters might not transgress his command, when he marked out the foundations of the earth, [30] then I was beside him, like a master worker, and I was daily his delight, playing before him always, [31] playing in his inhabited world and delighting in the human race.

It is important to begin by pointing out that this is a poetic writing. The passage presents Wisdom as God’s first act of creation. This being the case, Wisdom witnessed all of creation happening subsequently. Indeed, the language of verse 30 implies that Wisdom was not a mere spectator but was actively involved in some unstated way as a “master worker.”

This text apparently influenced Philo of Alexandria (30BC – 50 CE), a very important Jewish philosopher. Interacting with the Greek traditions he was trained in, Philo arguably identified the Wisdom of the Jewish tradition with the Logos of Greek deliberations. For Heraclitus, one of the earliest Greek philosophers to think about the nature of the Logos, the Logos appears as an impersonal organizing principle of the cosmos. Philo, however, imbued the Logos with life, calling it “the firstborn of God” (cited in Copleston). He might have derived this idea from Jewish Wisdom traditions, as Proverbs 8 makes a similar claim. He further writes, “the Logos of the living God is the bond of everything, holding all things together and binding all the parts, and prevents them from being dissolved and separated” (cited by Friedlander). So, like Heraclitus, Philo also held that the Logos was the organizing principle of the cosmos.

Justin Martyr and Origen were among the earliest Christians to draw on Proverbs 8 for ideas about the Trinitarian Father-Son relationship. A major problem for these church fathers was that Proverbs 8 seemed to suggest that Wisdom was created. To avoid this problem, some early Christians insisted that the poetic language of the chapter should not be pressed too hard for literalness. Origen read the created language as the eternal generation of the Son.

We should, however, stress that Proverbs 8 nowhere suggests that Wisdom was itself God or even divine. Nevertheless, the chapter contains ideas that were later further developed by Christians. For instance, John writes:

John 1:1-3 ESV
[1] In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. [2] He was in the beginning with God. [3] All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.

While alluding to Proverbs 8 (and Genesis 1), these Johannine verses make a major development of Proverbs 8’s claims. John explicitly says the Logos is God. John also goes further than Proverbs 8, stating that the Logos is the creator, not just a “master worker.”

Similarly, Paul also apparently interacts with ideas of the time:

Colossians 1:15-17 ESV
[15] He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. [16] For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him. [17] And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

By describing Jesus as “the firstborn of all creation,” Paul used the exact language Philo used for his Logos. Now, as we have explained elsewhere, this “firstborn” language in Paul does not entail that Jesus was created. Furthermore, Paul seems to engage with ideas found in Philo when he says, “And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together.” Recall that Philo states that “the Logos of the living God is the bond of everything, holding all things together,” as quoted earlier. Also, we already noted the pre-existence idea of Colossians 1:17 earlier in Proverbs 8.

The influence of Proverbs 8 on later Christian thought, canonical or not, cannot be overemphasized.

Works Cited

Copleston, Frederick. A History of Philosophy, Volume 1, Continuum, (2003), pp. 458–462.

Philo, De Profugis, cited in Gerald Friedlander, Hellenism and Christianity, P. Vallentine, 1912, pp. 114–115.

Continue Reading

On the Identity of God in 2 Corinthians 4:6

This entry is adapted from a longer piece that argues that New Testament authors identified Jesus as the creator of the cosmos.

In a recent entry, I argued that three New Testament authors see Jesus as the creator of the cosmos, including Paul. However, Paul also pens 2 Corinthians 4:6. Traditionally, commentators take “God” in this verse to refer to the Father. There are good reasons for doing so. Typically, when Paul says “God” in proximity to terms referring to Jesus (e.g., Jesus, Christ, Jesus Christ, the Son, etc) as a distinct person, “God” refers to the Father. For instance, “I give thanks to my God always for you because of the grace of God that was given you in Christ Jesus” (1 Corinthians 1:4). If we apply the same reasoning to 2 Corinthians 4:6, “God” will refer to the Father. This may then imply that the Father is the divine person in Genesis who says, “Let there be light,” and hence the immediate creator. Furthermore, the same divine person would be shining “the light of the knowledge of the glory of God” in human hearts by the gospel that Paul preached to the Corinthians. However, in light of the christological saturation of the passage, I shall argue that Paul’s language in 4:6 allows “God” to include Jesus and that this verse does not invalidate the conclusion that Jesus is the immediate creator of the cosmos.

We should begin with the rhetorical flourish that 4:6 is a part of:

2 Corinthians 4:4-6 ESV
In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. [5] For what we proclaim is not ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord, with ourselves as your servants for Jesus’ sake. [6] For God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.

Unbelievers are blinded as though in a dark room because they do not have “the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ.” This “glory of Christ” is connected to “the glory of God.” These are not competing divine glories. On the contrary, the “glory of God” is revealed in Christ. Jesus’ face is the locus of divine glory. Just as Moses radiated the glory of the old covenant (2 Corinthians 3:7), the glory of God also shines in “the face of Christ Jesus.”

The first point to note is that Paul does not seem concerned about differentiating among the divine persons in these verses. While it is true that when Paul mentions Christ in proximity to God, he usually refers to the Father, this is merely a pattern not necessitated by grammar rules or logic. Paul can and often clearly adds “Father” to labels intended to pick out the Father. For example:

2 Corinthians 1:2 ESV
Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.

But he does not use the paternal language in 4:4-6. Besides, Paul also uses “God” in ways that include Christ within the divine identity:

Romans 9:5 ESV
To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever. Amen.

Philippians 2:5-6 ESV
[5] Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, [6] who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped,

These verses show that Paul can include Christ in his “God” language. So, if Paul is not concerned with differentiating divine persons in 2 Corinthians 4:6, there is no reason to press too hard for his intended referent of “God.” He could be using the term in a sense inclusive of Christ.

More importantly, notice that the focus of 4:4-6 is Christ. Hence, Jesus is “the image of God,” the one proclaimed as Lord, and the one for whom Paul and his colleagues became servants of the Corinthians. Commentators generally believe that Paul alludes to Genesis 1:3 in verse 6, but notice that the light that shone in “our hearts” is “God” himself (“God…shone in our hearts.”) But elsewhere, Paul says Jesus resides in believers’ hearts:

Ephesians 3:14-17 ESV
[14] For this reason I bow my knees before the Father, [15] from whom every family in heaven and on earth is named, [16] that according to the riches of his glory he may grant you to be strengthened with power through his Spirit in your inner being, [17] so that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith—that you, being rooted and grounded in love,

Interestingly, Paul here clearly marks out “the Father,” but it is Christ who is said to dwell in the believer’s heart. Paul also says to the Galatians in 4:19 that it is Christ who is being formed in them. It gets even more fluid:

Romans 8:9-10 ESV
[9] You, however, are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if in fact the Spirit of God dwells in you. Anyone who does not have the Spirit of Christ does not belong to him. [10] But if Christ is in you, although the body is dead because of sin, the Spirit is life because of righteousness.

Here, Paul uses “Spirit of God,” “Spirit of Christ,” “Spirit,” and “Christ in you” interchangeably. So, who exactly resides in a believer’s heart? For Paul, the one God of Israel does! Paul takes much liberty in describing this reality, as these texts show. So, the “God” language of 2 Corinthians 4:6 is fluid and almost certainly includes Jesus.

We have thus seen that the standard reading that “God” in 2 Corinthians 4:6 refers to the Father is itself influenced by the pervasive assumption that the Father is the creator described in Genesis. Once we question that assumption, the popular reading loses its force. Interestingly, Paul also claims that Christ is the creator in the Corinthian Correspondence:

1 Corinthians 8:5-6 ESV
[5] For although there may be so-called gods in heaven or on earth—as indeed there are many “gods” and many “lords”— [6] yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist.

Once again, Paul clearly distinguishes among the divine persons when necessary. Here, Paul says “all things” are from the Father and through Jesus, using a similar language to that in his letter to the Colossians. So, we may not use 2 Corinthians 4:6 to invalidate an idea Paul posits within the Corinthian correspondence and elsewhere:

Colossians 1:16 NKJV
For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him.

So, the “all things” of 1 Corinthians 8:6 is all of creation.

An interesting connection with the gospel of John is worth mentioning briefly. John 3:35 says, “The Father loves the Son, and has given all things into His hand” – “all things” referring to all of creation, as John states:

John 1:1-5 ESV
[1] In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. [2] He was in the beginning with God. [3] All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. [4] In him was life, and the life was the light of men. [5] The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.

First, the Father committed “all things” to Jesus. Then, “all things” were made by and through Jesus. That is, Jesus brought “all things” into being – “and without him was not any thing made that was made.” Second, John says in Jesus was life and the life was the light of men, shining in darkness. This language is reminiscent of 2 Corinthians 4:6,

2 Corinthians 4:6 ESV
For God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.

Paul says “God…shone in our hearts,” while John says Christ is the source of light, not merely its reflector. The Johannine text enables us to see Paul’s point that “the light” is mediated by Jesus and Christologically defined. Hence, it is plausible that Jesus is the “God” in this text. In any case, nothing in 2 Corinthians 4:6 requires us to exclude Christ from the identity of the “God” who said, “Let light shine out of darkness.” If anything, Paul’s christological pattern encourages us to see Christ as the very one who spoke that primordial light into being and who now shines that same creative light into human hearts. And, given that, this verse does not threaten the conclusion that Jesus is the immediate creator described in Genesis 1.

Continue Reading

Jesus as the Creator

Three New Testament texts by different authors explicitly claim that Jesus is the creator of the cosmos. For some strange reasons I do not fully understand, many in the church have historically been uncomfortable with the claim and have found ways to blunt the force of the assertion:

John 1:1, 3, 14 ESV
[1]  In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
[3] All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.
[14] And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Colossians 1:15-17 ESV
[15]  He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. [16] For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him. [17] And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Hebrews 1:1-3 ESV
[1] Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, [2] but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also he created the world. [3] He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power. After making purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high,

Continue Reading

On Romans 10:17: Faith Comes By Hearing?

Romans 10:17 NKJV
So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

This is a popular text in Charismatic circles, especially the Word of Faith variants. In these settings, this text is generally understood as a divinely revealed secret of receiving and/or maintaining faith. If anyone lacked faith, an antidote would be to listen to the “word of God” continuously. There are two practical ways the “word of God” has been construed. In the days before audio Bibles became prevalent, the word of God was generally understood as a preacher’s sermon or his recorded reading of Bible passages. Nowadays, however, people are just encouraged to listen to audio Bibles and sermons. I do not want to invalidate this Charismatic practice, even though I have seen it abused. After all, motivational speakers have convinced us all that there is value in attending to positive speaking. However, I am convinced that this text is not about what some Charismatics have turned it into – a pretext for telling the people to return to hear a preacher’s sermon continually.

We should begin by pointing out some known problems with this text. First, some manuscripts say “the word of Christ” instead of “the word of God.” This, however, is arguably a trivial matter, since many New Testament texts slot Jesus into God’s place. It may serve as further evidence of how early Christians saw Jesus as God. Second, Romans 9-11 are probably the most hotly contested parts of the letter, with various interpretations on offer. In this piece, I shall argue that it is best to see Romans 10:17 as a conclusion of the idea begun in Romans 10:14 and that Romans 10:14-17 is itself a unit within the argument Paul crafts in 10:14-11:6.

We should inquire what Paul meant by “faith comes by hearing.” What sort of faith did he have in mind, and did he mean to say that faith unfailingly accompanies hearing the gospel message? It is unlikely that he meant to say faith always follows after hearing the gospel for two reasons. First, Paul was present when Stephen gave the longest and most comprehensive gospel sermon. Paul heard the message about Jesus, yet did not obtain faith. On the contrary, he walked away angry and approved of the death of the preacher. In fact, it was a post-resurrection appearance of Jesus on the road to Damascus that led Paul to faith. Charismatics are generally reluctant to allow experience to play a corrective role in a believer’s theology, and this is not utterly unreasonable. However, it must be said that a robust and comprehensive sermon did not save Saul of Tarsus; an experience of the divine did. When he finally did, as a trained Pharisee with deep knowledge of Scripture, he did not delay in boldly proclaiming that Jesus is the Lord. This is why Paul says he did not receive the gospel from any human, as we explored elsewhere. Second, Paul also discusses the thorny issue of many Israelites in his day not believing the gospel (10:16). This strongly suggests that the “faith” Paul had in mind is saving faith; the faith that turns unbelievers to believers. Paul says his fellow Israelites heard the message:

Continue Reading

God and Hagar: Abraham’s Evil Treatment of Hagar

Abraham is a significant figure in Judaism, including the form that has evolved into the mutated form we know today as Christianity. The gospel of Jesus was first preached to Abraham as God sovereignly chose to set his redemption plans in motion through Abraham. Generations of Bible readers have also noted the atypical commitment of Abraham to perform what God required of him in the Aqedah story. This story raises many moral questions, as we discussed elsewhere. These points, along with many others, including Abraham’s mention in the “Hall of Faith” chapter of the book of Hebrews, have led many in the church to downplay his not-quite godly episodes. One of such episodes is how he treated Hagar.

Continue Reading

Celebrating Queen Vashti

Many scholars today believe that the book of Esther was written as a play, not history. There are several reasons why this makes sense, but we will not focus on those here. While the Protestant canon places Esther alongside historical books like Ezra and Nehemiah, the Hebrew Bible Canon places the book alongside Wisdom literature. It is also worth noting that there are several known versions of the Book of Esther, each with notable differences. For instance, preachers have often pointed out that the book of Esther is a book of the Bible that does not mention God at all; God is an invisible hand writing the story. However, in some of the other versions, God is explicitly invoked in the story.

Furthermore, Esther and the Song of Solomon are books that were hotly contested during the process of establishing the Hebrew Bible canon. One apparent reason is that these books are rather sexual, and some of the deciding powers did not think that sex and spirituality walk together. In the case of Esther, there might have been another reason people resisted its canonization: the story is about heroines, not a hero.

That’s right. I think there are two heroines in the book of Esther, though we have often focused on one and maligned the other. The Jewish girl, Esther, certainly deserves the praises that have been accorded her since the book was written. She risked her life by approaching the Persian king unbidded:

Continue Reading

Unpacking Ministry Gifts: A Biblical Reality Check

Defining the Fivefold Ministry Gifts

The phrase “Fivefold ministry gifts” is a common term in charismatic circles, referring to the specific person-gifts the Spirit gives for the building of the Church. The gifts are apostle, prophet, pastor, evangelist, and teacher. Like most things humans touch, people have historically sought to place these gifts in hierarchical orders, with “Apostle” always coming out on top. Christians have also taken on these labels as pre-nominal titles. For example, Apostle Ade and Pastor Chike. Interestingly, to my knowledge, people have not used “teacher” as a pre-nominal title, unlike all others. I guess that “teacher” is at the very bottom of the ladder.

Continue Reading

An Exegetical Proposal for Understanding Ephesians 2:20 and 3:5

Ephesians 2:19-20 ESV
[19] So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, [20] built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone,

Earlier, I wrote on some matters arising from the way we have often described the fivefold ministry gifts. A central argument of that piece is that the Bible’s uses of these terms – apostle, prophet, evangelist, pastor, and teacher – are not as rigid as many modern church sermons suggest. On the contrary, these gifts seemed to be mutable roles God empowered believers to perform. In this piece, my focus is slightly different, although it remains on the ministry gifts.

As I have written in a few blog entries, Paul, our chief source on the ministry gifts, connects Jesus’ giving of the gifts to the conquest of Bashan and Hades, long-term foes of Yahweh, through his death, resurrection, and ascension. It was in that context that Paul says ministry gifts were given:

Ephesians 4:11-14 NRSV
[11] The gifts he gave were that some would be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, some pastors and teachers, [12] to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ, [13] until all of us come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to maturity, to the measure of the full stature of Christ. [14] We must no longer be children, tossed to and fro and blown about by every wind of doctrine, by people’s trickery, by their craftiness in deceitful scheming.

Continue Reading

On the Gender of God: Is God Male?

Presumably, some people, including irreligious ones, would answer the question in the negative: God is not male. In that case, that form of the question may not be the most helpful. What if we modify the question slightly and ask instead: Are men more like God than women are? I suspect that this formulation might yield more fruitful results. The matter before us subtly influences other beliefs; some are harmful and dangerous.

I first became aware of this matter in an undergraduate Hebrew Bible Writings class. The ethnically Jewish, non-religious professor made a comment that set off the rabbit hole: “The name ‘Yahweh’ in Hebrew is as grammatically masculine as “Richard” is in America.” I had not listened closely enough to realize that grammatical and biological genders are separate. My mind immediately went down a long rabbit hole. It seemed to me that whatever it meant to say God was masculine could not exactly mean how we ordinarily use the term for humans. The reason seemed simple: God is a spirit. To be a spirit is to be unembodied. I had to admit, on the other hand, that God is consistently called a Father and Jesus was a male human for 33 years. I managed to get out of the hole by pushing the issue aside so I could focus on the lecture. Now is the time to carefully unpack this crucial matter.

Language Matters: What Does it Mean to be Male?

Many of us today use the terms “male/man” and “female/woman” synonymously – and this is more or less the practice I’ll uphold in this entry. However, it is beneficial to be aware of and learn from advancements in Psychology and Gender Studies. In the ancient world and many parts of our world today, biology is assumed to determine one’s gender. In the Greco-Roman world, for instance, women were thought to be irrational, unsuitable for ruling, needing male guidance, and emotional. Amy Peeler notes that because women were generally smaller in body, they were also thought to be smaller in mind and spirit (90). In other words, to be female meant manifesting the attributes above. The problem begins when we observe that not all women fit into that box, and some men check some of the boxes. This observation motivated some scholars to separate biology from sociology and sex from gender. Biology determines sex, but social factors determine gender. This move raises an obvious question: what does being male (or female) mean?

Continue Reading

Surprising Quran-Bible Agreement: God as Father

Much of the Quran is devoted to a single idea: Islamic monotheism. While Christianity and Judaism also affirm the doctrine of monotheism, Islam is different. The Quran spells out this idea in clear terms in Surah 6. There are no deities besides Allah alone that govern the entire cosmic order. Hence, Allah sovereignly determines who he guides on the right path and who he leads into error (6:39, 125). Also, if Allah afflicts a person, no one else can remedy it (6:17). For every prophet Allah appointed, he also appointed human and spirit enemies for the prophet (6:112). These ideas convey that Allah alone governs the universe as He sees fit. Indeed, verse 102 explicitly puts it like this:


Surah Al-Anaam, Verse 102:
ذَٰلِكُمُ اللَّهُ رَبُّكُمْ لَا إِلَٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ خَالِقُ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ فَاعْبُدُوهُ وَهُوَ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ وَكِيلٌ

That is Allah, your Lord, there is no god but He; the Creator of all things, therefore serve Him, and He has charge of all things.

Continue Reading
1 2 3 8