Demonstrating the Islamic Dilemma

If the Quran is true, then the Bible is true. But if the Bible is true, then the Quran is false.

That is the dilemma. I know this will disturb some, and others may take offense. But I want to begin by saying I’m not looking to do any of those things. My interest here is truth. I am interested in what we can establish from primary texts. As I often remark, I do not pretend to be an expert. In fact, I would appreciate substantive, reasoned pushback and clarification.

I will present my argument in three blocks. First, I will show that the Quran consistently approves of the Bible, especially the Torah and the Injeel (i.e., Gospels), as divinely inspired and unalterable words of Allah. Then, I will show that the Quran is often wrong in many details compared to the Bible. Finally, I’ll demonstrate that the Bible knows nothing about and does not anticipate the Quran.

We begin with Surah Al-Baqara, Verse 136:
قُولُوا آمَنَّا بِاللَّهِ وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَيْنَا وَمَا أُنزِلَ إِلَىٰ إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَإِسْمَاعِيلَ وَإِسْحَاقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ وَالْأَسْبَاطِ وَمَا أُوتِيَ مُوسَىٰ وَعِيسَىٰ وَمَا أُوتِيَ النَّبِيُّونَ مِن رَّبِّهِمْ لَا نُفَرِّقُ بَيْنَ أَحَدٍ مِّنْهُمْ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ

Say, [O believers], “We have believed in Allah and what has been revealed to us and what has been revealed to Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and the Descendants and what was given to Moses and Jesus and what was given to the prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and we are Muslims [in submission] to Him.”

These verses of Quran 2 clearly imply consistency and continuity in the messages revealed to Abraham all the way to Jesus. Verse 146 adds, “Those to whom We gave the Scripture know him as they know their own sons,” even if not all of them were faithful. To avoid any misconception, Allah further reveals Quran 5, Surah Al-Maeda, Verse 46:

وَقَفَّيْنَا عَلَىٰ آثَارِهِم بِعِيسَى ابْنِ مَرْيَمَ مُصَدِّقًا لِّمَا بَيْنَ يَدَيْهِ مِنَ التَّوْرَاةِ وَآتَيْنَاهُ الْإِنجِيلَ فِيهِ هُدًى وَنُورٌ وَمُصَدِّقًا لِّمَا بَيْنَ يَدَيْهِ مِنَ التَّوْرَاةِ وَهُدًى وَمَوْعِظَةً لِّلْمُتَّقِينَ

And We sent, following in their footsteps, Jesus, the son of Mary, confirming that which came before him in the Torah; and We gave him the Gospel, in which was guidance and light and confirming that which preceded it of the Torah as guidance and instruction for the righteous.

Allah has been consistent in his messaging. The message revealed to Jesus in the Gospels continues and confirms what was revealed to Moses in the Torah. Allah also says the Gospel message of Jesus “was guidance and light” for the righteous. In fact, Allah so approves of the Gospel that he further says:

Surah Al-Maeda, Verse 47:
وَلْيَحْكُمْ أَهْلُ الْإِنجِيلِ بِمَا أَنزَلَ اللَّهُ فِيهِ وَمَن لَّمْ يَحْكُم بِمَا أَنزَلَ اللَّهُ فَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْفَاسِقُونَ

And let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein. And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed – then it is those who are the defiantly disobedient.

So, again, we see that Allah claims to have revealed the Gospel and expects Christians to live and judge by it. Indeed, Allah rewarded those who faithfully lived by the Gospel:

Surah Al-Hadid, Verse 27:
ثُمَّ قَفَّيْنَا عَلَىٰ آثَارِهِم بِرُسُلِنَا وَقَفَّيْنَا بِعِيسَى ابْنِ مَرْيَمَ وَآتَيْنَاهُ الْإِنجِيلَ وَجَعَلْنَا فِي قُلُوبِ الَّذِينَ اتَّبَعُوهُ رَأْفَةً وَرَحْمَةً وَرَهْبَانِيَّةً ابْتَدَعُوهَا مَا كَتَبْنَاهَا عَلَيْهِمْ إِلَّا ابْتِغَاءَ رِضْوَانِ اللَّهِ فَمَا رَعَوْهَا حَقَّ رِعَايَتِهَا فَآتَيْنَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا مِنْهُمْ أَجْرَهُمْ وَكَثِيرٌ مِّنْهُمْ فَاسِقُونَ

Then We sent following their footsteps Our messengers and followed [them] with Jesus, the son of Mary, and gave him the Gospel. And We placed in the hearts of those who followed him compassion and mercy and monasticism, which they innovated; We did not prescribe it for them except [that they did so] seeking the approval of Allah . But they did not observe it with due observance. So We gave the ones who believed among them their reward, but many of them are defiantly disobedient.

It is typically at this point in conversations that Muslim apologists generally claim that the Gospel has been corrupted. There are at least two problems with this claim. First, the Quran never makes such a claim, as shown elsewhere. On the contrary, the Quran plainly says the Bible of Muhammed’s time was reliable and trustworthy (5:43 – 44). Second, the Quran forbids such a claim. If the Gospel can be corrupted, being the authorized word of Allah, then the Quran can be corrupted. You can’t have one but not the other. Besides, Allah says his words are unalterable:

Surah Al-Anaam, Verse 34:
وَلَقَدْ كُذِّبَتْ رُسُلٌ مِّن قَبْلِكَ فَصَبَرُوا عَلَىٰ مَا كُذِّبُوا وَأُوذُوا حَتَّىٰ أَتَاهُمْ نَصْرُنَا وَلَا مُبَدِّلَ لِكَلِمَاتِ اللَّهِ وَلَقَدْ جَاءَكَ مِن نَّبَإِ الْمُرْسَلِينَ

And certainly were messengers denied before you, but they were patient over [the effects of] denial, and they were harmed until Our victory came to them. And none can alter the words of Allah . And there has certainly come to you some information about the [previous] messengers.

Surah Al-Anaam, Verse 115:
وَتَمَّتْ كَلِمَتُ رَبِّكَ صِدْقًا وَعَدْلًا لَّا مُبَدِّلَ لِكَلِمَاتِهِ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْعَلِيمُ

And the word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and in justice. None can alter His words, and He is the Hearing, the Knowing.

So, we see that Allah’s words cannot be altered. Furthermore, the popular idea among Muslims that the Bible was corrupt ought to have been abandoned after the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls. These scrolls belonged to a community that existed before Jesus’s time, and the Torah therein is the same as the one in our Bible.

Here we are, then, in our argument. The Quran consistently affirms that the messages revealed to prophets like Abraham, Moses, David, and Jesus all ultimately derived from Allah, and Allah’s words are incorruptible. Indeed, the Quran explicitly makes specific relevant claims:

Surah Ghafir, Verse 78:
وَلَقَدْ أَرْسَلْنَا رُسُلًا مِّن قَبْلِكَ مِنْهُم مَّن قَصَصْنَا عَلَيْكَ وَمِنْهُم مَّن لَّمْ نَقْصُصْ عَلَيْكَ وَمَا كَانَ لِرَسُولٍ أَن يَأْتِيَ بِآيَةٍ إِلَّا بِإِذْنِ اللَّهِ فَإِذَا جَاءَ أَمْرُ اللَّهِ قُضِيَ بِالْحَقِّ وَخَسِرَ هُنَالِكَ الْمُبْطِلُونَ

And We have already sent messengers before you. Among them are those [whose stories] We have related to you, and among them are those [whose stories] We have not related to you. And it was not for any messenger to bring a sign [or verse] except by permission of Allah . So when the command of Allah comes, it will be concluded in truth, and the falsifiers will thereupon lose [all].

The implication, again, is that the stories Allah revealed to Muhammed about prophets before him are correct and true. This means we should expect to find the same stories in the Bible, or, at the least, we should not find inconsistency. Again, the Quran supports this reading:

Surah Fussilat, Verse 43:
مَّا يُقَالُ لَكَ إِلَّا مَا قَدْ قِيلَ لِلرُّسُلِ مِن قَبْلِكَ إِنَّ رَبَّكَ لَذُو مَغْفِرَةٍ وَذُو عِقَابٍ أَلِيمٍ

Nothing is said to you, [O Muhammad], except what was already said to the messengers before you. Indeed, your Lord is a possessor of forgiveness and a possessor of painful penalty.

The problem begins when we compare what Allah supposedly revealed in the Bible to what Muhammed claims in the Quran. We find too many inconsistencies – the sort one might expect from a fabrication. Let us begin with Surah 10:

Surah Yunus, Verse 37:
وَمَا كَانَ هَٰذَا الْقُرْآنُ أَن يُفْتَرَىٰ مِن دُونِ اللَّهِ وَلَٰكِن تَصْدِيقَ الَّذِي بَيْنَ يَدَيْهِ وَتَفْصِيلَ الْكِتَابِ لَا رَيْبَ فِيهِ مِن رَّبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ

And it was not [possible] for this Qur’an to be produced by other than Allah , but [it is] a confirmation of what was before it and a detailed explanation of the [former] Scripture, about which there is no doubt, from the Lord of the worlds.

The Quran is only about one-sixth the size of the Bible, yet it claims to be a “detailed explanation” of the Bible. The easily verifiable truth is that the Quran lacks details and often briefly alludes to biblical stories, expecting the readers to consult the Bible for details. For instance, in Quran 2, while seeking a justification for a holy army that fights on behalf of Allah, Muhammed leans on the story of the ancient Israelites in the days of kings Saul and David. The Quran devotes only six short verses to the story in 2:246 – 251, while the Bible has ten chapters for it. Unsurprisingly, what ensues is a confusion. Consider this:

Surah Al-Baqara, Verse 246:
أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى الْمَلَإِ مِن بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ مِن بَعْدِ مُوسَىٰ إِذْ قَالُوا لِنَبِيٍّ لَّهُمُ ابْعَثْ لَنَا مَلِكًا نُّقَاتِلْ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ قَالَ هَلْ عَسَيْتُمْ إِن كُتِبَ عَلَيْكُمُ الْقِتَالُ أَلَّا تُقَاتِلُوا قَالُوا وَمَا لَنَا أَلَّا نُقَاتِلَ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ وَقَدْ أُخْرِجْنَا مِن دِيَارِنَا وَأَبْنَائِنَا فَلَمَّا كُتِبَ عَلَيْهِمُ الْقِتَالُ تَوَلَّوْا إِلَّا قَلِيلًا مِّنْهُمْ وَاللَّهُ عَلِيمٌ بِالظَّالِمِينَ

Have you not considered the assembly of the Children of Israel after [the time of] Moses when they said to a prophet of theirs, “Send to us a king, and we will fight in the way of Allah “? He said, “Would you perhaps refrain from fighting if fighting was prescribed for you?” They said, “And why should we not fight in the cause of Allah when we have been driven out from our homes and from our children?” But when fighting was prescribed for them, they turned away, except for a few of them. And Allah is Knowing of the wrongdoers.

Surah Al-Baqara, Verse 247:
وَقَالَ لَهُمْ نَبِيُّهُمْ إِنَّ اللَّهَ قَدْ بَعَثَ لَكُمْ طَالُوتَ مَلِكًا قَالُوا أَنَّىٰ يَكُونُ لَهُ الْمُلْكُ عَلَيْنَا وَنَحْنُ أَحَقُّ بِالْمُلْكِ مِنْهُ وَلَمْ يُؤْتَ سَعَةً مِّنَ الْمَالِ قَالَ إِنَّ اللَّهَ اصْطَفَاهُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَزَادَهُ بَسْطَةً فِي الْعِلْمِ وَالْجِسْمِ وَاللَّهُ يُؤْتِي مُلْكَهُ مَن يَشَاءُ وَاللَّهُ وَاسِعٌ عَلِيمٌ

And their prophet said to them, “Indeed, Allah has sent to you Saul as a king.” They said, “How can he have kingship over us while we are more worthy of kingship than him and he has not been given any measure of wealth?” He said, “Indeed, Allah has chosen him over you and has increased him abundantly in knowledge and stature. And Allah gives His sovereignty to whom He wills. And Allah is all-Encompassing [in favor] and Knowing.”

This, in fact, did not happen. In the Bible, the Israelites wanted a human king after the prophet Samuel had become old and his children were not competent judges:

1 Samuel 8:4-5 ESV
[4] Then all the elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel at Ramah [5] and said to him, “Behold, you are old and your sons do not walk in your ways. Now appoint for us a king to judge us like all the nations.”

Unlike the Quran’s stated motive in 2:246, the Israelites did not ask for a king so they could become a fighting people. They wanted a king to judge their affairs. Of course, they knew that kings also fought battles. Indeed, Samuel warned them that the king they would get would rule them unfairly by conscripting their children into his army, perhaps against their will (1 Samuel 8:11 – 14). But when Saul was finally revealed as the king, the people did not protest – they were too desperate for a king. Indeed, here is how the Bible records their response:

1 Samuel 10:24 ESV
And Samuel said to all the people, “Do you see him whom the Lord has chosen? There is none like him among all the people.” And all the people shouted, “Long live the king!”

The protest that the Quran attributes to the people against the selection of Saul was actually something Saul himself did. He was a man of low self-esteem. Upon having a chance to speak with the revered prophet Samuel, Saul said:

1 Samuel 9:21 ESV
Saul answered, “Am I not a Benjaminite, from the least of the tribes of Israel? And is not my clan the humblest of all the clans of the tribe of Benjamin? Why then have you spoken to me in this way?”

It is low self-esteem masquerading as humility. The additional details in Quran 2:247 are apocryphal. That is not how it happened.

This sort of things are not the exceptions but the rules. The Quran repeatedly misses all kinds of details too many to count. For instance, the Quran says Pharaoh’s wife raised Moses in the palace while the Bible says it was Pharaoh’s daughter. Quran 12:70 says a “golden bowl” belonging to the prince of Egypt, Joseph, was placed in Benjamin’s bag while the Bible says it was a “silver cup.” Then there are instances of extra-biblical embellishment of biblical stories. I have blogged about cases of the Quran’s use of known fictional Judeo-Christian materials in its embellishment. For instance, the Quran tells a story of the boy Jesus animating a clay bird. This story existed in a recognizable form in the non-authoritative, pseudepigraphal Infancy Gospel of Thomas. In other words, while claiming divine revelation, we see that the Quran merely repurposed human materials known to critics in Muhammed’s day.

Now, we are ready to proceed to the final part of the argument. Consider the following:

Surah As-Saff, Verse 6:
وَإِذْ قَالَ عِيسَى ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ يَا بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ إِنِّي رَسُولُ اللَّهِ إِلَيْكُم مُّصَدِّقًا لِّمَا بَيْنَ يَدَيَّ مِنَ التَّوْرَاةِ وَمُبَشِّرًا بِرَسُولٍ يَأْتِي مِن بَعْدِي اسْمُهُ أَحْمَدُ فَلَمَّا جَاءَهُم بِالْبَيِّنَاتِ قَالُوا هَٰذَا سِحْرٌ مُّبِينٌ

And [mention] when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, “O children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad.” But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, “This is obvious magic.”

The Quran explicitly says Jesus anticipates the prophethood of Muhammed while also preserving evidence that even 7th century critics did not buy it. This verse has led generations of Muslims to attempt to locate Muhammed in the Bible. John is one common place Muslims go to. Some of the usual candidates are:

John 1:20-21 ESV
[20] He confessed, and did not deny, but confessed, “I am not the Christ.” [21] And they asked him, “What then? Are you Elijah?” He said, “I am not.” “Are you the Prophet?” And he answered, “No.”

John 14:16 ESV
And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Helper, to be with you forever,

There are too many reasons why this move is effete and ridiculous. First, the first chapter of John forbids a Muslim from even looking in the book for Muhammed. A good portion of the Quran is devoted to Islamic monotheism and the denial of the divinity of Jesus. But John begins his gospel account thus:

John 1:1-4 ESV
[1] In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. [2] He was in the beginning with God. [3] All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. [4] In him was life, and the life was the light of men.

John affirms a plurality in the Godhead and names Jesus as a member of the Godhead. Clearly, John envisions a different God than the Quranic Allah.

Second, the passages above clearly do not refer to Muhammed. The John 1:20 – 21 passage above is about the JEWISH Messiah, and verse 20 explicitly says that. Third, Muhammed died and did not resurrect and so he did not live “forever.” Even if he did, Muhammed never met the disciples of Jesus and could not have been with them forever. Fourth, the very next verse in John 14 explicitly names the referent, “the Spirit of Truth” who, in the narrative world of John, is also referred to as the Holy Spirit.

Besides, according to the Torah, which Allah supposedly revealed, it is IMPOSSIBLE for Muhammed (or anyone else in his genealogy) to be “the prophet.” When God called Abraham and promised him that his offspring will be a blessing to the world, God seemingly did not set the promise rolling ten years after. Abraham was worried and tried to help God out by taking a second wife, Hagar. Hagar gave birth to Ishmael, and Abraham reasoned that God’s promise and blessing might materialize through Ishmael’s lineage. But God explicitly rejected Ishmael and his lineage:

Genesis 17:18-21 ESV
[18] And Abraham said to God, “Oh that Ishmael might live before you!” [19] God said, “No, but Sarah your wife shall bear you a son, and you shall call his name Isaac. I will establish my covenant with him as an everlasting covenant for his offspring after him. [20] As for Ishmael, I have heard you; behold, I have blessed him and will make him fruitful and multiply him greatly. He shall father twelve princes, and I will make him into a great nation. [21] But I will establish my covenant with Isaac, whom Sarah shall bear to you at this time next year.”

Because he was Abraham’s son, God prospered Ishmael materially. But Ishmael was not going to bear the covenant of a seed of Abraham becoming a blessing to the world. Muhammed cannot be found anywhere in the Bible because Allah made sure of it centuries prior.

Here we are then. If the Quran is true, the Bible is true. But if the Bible is true, the Quran is demonstrably false. This is the Islamic Dilemma.

If you are an informed Muslim or know someone who is, consider sharing this piece with them.

Continue Reading

Women are Eternally Inferior in Islam

To a Christian, the fourth chapter of the Quran would be most important for its emphatic denial of the crucifixion of Jesus (4:157) and Jesus’ sonship (4:171), which are important ideas we have addressed elsewhere. However, this chapter also fleshes out an idea earlier introduced in the Quran: the inferiority of women. As we shall argue, the Quran is consistent in its portrayal of the inferiority of women. Women in Islam are not only inferior in this life but will also remain inferior in the afterlife. Let us begin with 4:2-3:

Surah An-Nisa, Verse 2:
وَآتُوا الْيَتَامَىٰ أَمْوَالَهُمْ وَلَا تَتَبَدَّلُوا الْخَبِيثَ بِالطَّيِّبِ وَلَا تَأْكُلُوا أَمْوَالَهُمْ إِلَىٰ أَمْوَالِكُمْ إِنَّهُ كَانَ حُوبًا كَبِيرًا

And give to the orphans their property, and do not substitute worthless (things) for (their) good (ones), and do not devour their property (as an addition) to your own property; this is surely a great crime.

Surah An-Nisa, Verse 3:
وَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ أَلَّا تُقْسِطُوا فِي الْيَتَامَىٰ فَانكِحُوا مَا طَابَ لَكُم مِّنَ النِّسَاءِ مَثْنَىٰ وَثُلَاثَ وَرُبَاعَ فَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ أَلَّا تَعْدِلُوا فَوَاحِدَةً أَوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُكُمْ ذَٰلِكَ أَدْنَىٰ أَلَّا تَعُولُوا

And if you fear that you cannot act equitably towards orphans, then marry such women as seem good to you, two and three and four; but if you fear that you will not do justice (between them), then (marry) only one or what your right hands possess; this is more proper, that you may not deviate from the right course.

Continue Reading

Unveiling Scriptures: The Quran on Alleged Bible Corruption

“Elohim”, “Allah,” and “God” function quite similarly in their original linguistic contexts. Indeed, the English language is somewhat odd here. The modern rule of capitalizing proper nouns muddies the waters. Initially, without qualifications, these words do not pick out any specific deity. At various points, I have highlighted that elohim is a common noun, not a proper one. In the Bible, elohim refers to Yahweh, Satan, angels, foreign gods, the spirit of a dead human, and so on.
Similarly, “allah” in the pre-Islamic era does not mean what it is now taken to mean. Indeed, the allah of that era was Hubal, the moon god with a dedicated shrine at the famous Ka’ba in Mecca. Some Islamic sources tell us that Hubal was imported from Syria. According to Islamic tradition, Muhammed cleansed the Kabah by destroying the idols and rededicating it to another God identified with the Biblical God, but this narrative is not without problems, as we shall now see.

Continue Reading

The Quran and Judeo-Christian Pseudepigrapha (Part 5, Finale): The Crucifixion and Trinity

We have seen enough examples to demonstrate that some extra-biblical materials in the Quran ultimately derived from Judeo-Christian writings, whether commentaries or creative fictional works. There are other examples one may cite, such as how a raven taught Cain to bury his murdered brother, Jesus talking as an infant, Joseph’s torn tunic (establishing his innocence with Potiphar’s wife), and Jinn being created from fire. These all derived from Jewish exegetical works. These observations undermine certain critical Islamic beliefs.

First, the idea that the Quran is a perfect revelation from God given to restore corrupted biblical materials or details is undercut. Muslims typically believe this idea not because there is such evidence of corruption in the Bible but because many of them believe that the Quran says so, and they believe the Quran. (At this point, the typical Muslim reader thinks of differing details in the original Biblical manuscripts as evidence of corruption. Yes, “corruption,” but not the kind that helps the Quran’s narrative. Furthermore, Quranic manuscripts also show differing details as well. See our dedicated treatment of this issue here.) Second, the extra-biblical details that the Quran features are from known fictional sources. As we shall see soon, the Quran preserves evidence of seventh-century critics pointing out to Muhammed that his stories were not original but adaptations of old sayings. In light of all we have said, let us now look into the Quran’s position on two Christian doctrines: the crucifixion of Jesus and the Trinity.

Continue Reading

The Quran and Judeo-Christian Pseudepigrapha (Part 4): Quran 3:35-44 and the Protevangelium of James

John the Baptist was a weird but essential figure in the ministry of Jesus. The Gospels suggest that the men are cousins through their mothers. John’s parents were Zechariah and Elizabeth. Jesus’ parents need no introduction. The Gospels, especially Matthew and Luke, only go as far back in their stories as when Joseph and Mary were already betrothed. Hence, we have no biblical records of the birth of Mary or Joseph.


The Quran, on the other hand, has quite a bit to say about the birth of Mary, her childhood, and, as I will explain, how Joseph was chosen for her as a husband. We find this story in Quran 3:35-44,

Surah Aal-e-Imran, Verse 35:
إِذْ قَالَتِ امْرَأَتُ عِمْرَانَ رَبِّ إِنِّي نَذَرْتُ لَكَ مَا فِي بَطْنِي مُحَرَّرًا فَتَقَبَّلْ مِنِّي إِنَّكَ أَنتَ السَّمِيعُ الْعَلِيمُ

When a woman of Imran said: My Lord! Surely I vow to Thee what is in my womb, to be devoted (to Thy service); accept therefore from me, surely Thou art the Hearing, the Knowing.

Continue Reading

The Quran and Judeo-Christian Pseudepigrapha (Part 3): Quran 2, Genesis Rabbah, and the Apocalypse of Moses

Page 2 of the Bible tells the story of the creation of Adam. Of all the details given, nothing is said about how angels felt about the creation of humans. In fact, if one does not have other later biblical information to go by, one wouldn’t even know that angels existed.

The Quran, on the other hand, has much to say about how angels felt about God’s intent to create humans. All of them, at first, were opposed to the creation of humans. But after Adam demonstrated his superior knowledge, many angels changed their minds. Satan, however, never accepted the idea. In fact, the Quran teaches that Satan was cast away from heaven because he would not accept God’s sovereign choice to create humans.

Continue Reading

The Quran and Judeo-Christian Pseudepigrapha (Part 2): Quran 6:74 – 79 and the Apocalypse of Abraham

In the Judeo-Christian worldview, Abraham is a big deal. Narratively, he is a type of Adam, the human who carries forward the tasks of Adam and initiates the process of undoing his errors. When humanity at Babel went south, God called Abraham out from his family to reboot the Humanity Project. Abraham was to be how God would achieve the goal of having worldwide humans loyal to him. However, the Bible does not say much about his prior life. We know he originated from the Ur of the Chaldeans, and we have his genealogy. That’s about it.

The Quran, on the other hand, has more to say about Abraham’s prior life. For instance, the Quran tells about Abraham turning away from paganism to embrace Allah in Quran 6, after contemplating on some heavenly bodies:

Continue Reading

The Quran and Judeo-Christian Pseudepigrapha (Part 1): Quran 3, 19, the Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew, and Childhood of the Saviour

It is an article of faith in Islam that the Quran is a perfect revelation of God delivered through the prophet Muhammad to humanity. It became necessary for God to send the Quran because of the corruptions of the Scriptures of Judaism and Christianity that came before it. (Strictly and properly speaking, Christianity is a sect of Judaism. It was one of many sects of Judaism in the first century AD.) In a restorative move, God provided Muhammed with fresh revelations. In some cases, the revelations are altogether missing from the Bible – which, in a typical Muslim’s mind, further confirms the corruption charges – or are present in the Bible in a different form.

Continue Reading